'The System Worked'!... about as well as the terrorist bomb!

After a terrorist, on the 'Terrorist Watch List', got on a NW/Delta flight from Amsterdam to Detroit, and then tried to blow up the plane, our highly intelligent DHS Chief, Janet Napolitano, declared on Sunday... 'the system worked'!

Let's examine just how well 'the system' actually worked!

1) A known Al Qeada sympathiser, on the Terrorist Watch List, was issued a VISA to visit the U.S. DAHHHH! How did the State Department issue this guy a VISA? Let's see... who's Sec of State... Oh... It's Hillary!

2) The terrorist was ban from entering the U.K. but ok'ed to come to the USA! Again... why was a VISA issued to this guy?

3) Even his Father had warned authorities his son had become 'radicalized' and should be watched! Why didn't someone in DHS take this seriously?

4) It was known he recently visited Yemen... a hot bed for terrorist training! Gee...maybe we should listen to a prominent family member when he warns everyone of a pending problem!

5) A recent report indicates the terrorist may NOT have even had a passport but was still allowed to board the plane! WOW... how did that happen? Someone needs to have their ass kicked for that!

6) Inexpensive 'scanning and detection' technology, which is available now and could have detected the loaded underwear, was not used to screen this clown. But... we are still using magnetometers to pick-up large metal objects... like guns!

7) The terrorist paid for his ticket with cash, had no luggage and no return ticket! Gee... who would think that could be an indicator?

But... according to our DHS Chief said "the system worked'! It looks like 'the system worked' about as well as the terrorist's bomb! Did we get lucky here? I think we did... and it's exposed another incompetent Obama appointment!

The Obama Administration has been so busy trying to destroy Capitalism and individual freedom, they've dropped the ball on their first priority... protecting our Homeland and citizens! If Janet Napolitano had any credibility she'd resign after making such a stupid statement. It's obvious she has no idea what she is doing! A vote of NO CONFIDENCE!

The only thing that worked in this situation was the passenger that jumped this guy and foiled the bombing.

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

The debate is over... and Al Gore invented the Internet!

100 reasons why climate change is natural.

1) There is “no real scientific proof” that the current warming is caused by the rise of greenhouse gases from man’s activity.

2) Man-made carbon dioxide emissions throughout human history constitute less than 0.00022 percent of the total naturally emitted from the mantle of the earth during geological history.

3) Warmer periods of the Earth’s history came around 800 years before rises in CO2 levels.

4) After World War II, there was a huge surge in recorded CO2 emissions but global temperatures fell for four decades after 1940.

5) Throughout the Earth’s history, temperatures have often been warmer than now and CO2 levels have often been higher – more than ten times as high.

6) Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time.

7) The 0.7C increase in the average global temperature over the last hundred years is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term, natural climate trends.

8) The IPCC theory is driven by just 60 scientists and favorable reviewers not the 4,000 usually cited.

9) Leaked e-mails from British climate scientists – in a scandal known as “Climate-gate” - suggest that data has been manipulated to exaggerate global warming

10) A large body of scientific research suggests that the sun is responsible for the greater share of climate change during the past hundred years.

11) Politicians and activists claim rising sea levels are a direct cause of global warming but sea levels rates have been increasing steadily since the last ice age 10,000 ago

12) Philip Stott, Emeritus Professor of Biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London says climate change is too complicated to be caused by just one factor, whether CO2 or clouds

13) Peter Lilley MP said last month that “fewer people in Britain than in any other country believe in the importance of global warming. That is despite the fact that our Government and our political class—predominantly—are more committed to it than their counterparts in any other country in the world”.

14) In pursuit of the global warming rhetoric, wind farms will do very little to nothing to reduce CO2 emissions

15) Professor Plimer, Professor of Geology and Earth Sciences at the University of Adelaide, stated that the idea of taking a single trace gas in the atmosphere, accusing it and finding it guilty of total responsibility for climate change, is an “absurdity”

16) A Harvard University astrophysicist and geophysicist, Willie Soon, said he is “embarrassed and puzzled” by the shallow science in papers that support the proposition that the earth faces a climate crisis caused by global warming.

17) The science of what determines the earth’s temperature is in fact far from settled or understood.

18) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, CO2 is a minor greenhouse gas, unlike water vapor which is tied to climate concerns, and which we can’t even pretend to control

19) A petition by scientists trying to tell the world that the political and media portrayal of global warming is false was put forward in the Heidelberg Appeal in 1992. Today, more than 4,000 signatories, including 72 Nobel Prize winners, from 106 countries have signed it.

20) It is claimed the average global temperature increased at a dangerously fast rate in the 20th century but the recent rate of average global temperature rise has been between 1 and 2 degrees C per century - within natural rates

21) Professor Zbigniew Jaworowski, Chairman of the Scientific Council of the Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection in Warsaw, Poland says the earth’s temperature has more to do with cloud cover and water vapor than CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.

22) There is strong evidence from solar studies which suggests that the Earth’s current temperature stasis will be followed by climatic cooling over the next few decades

23) It is myth that receding glaciers are proof of global warming as glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for many centuries

24) It is a falsehood that the earth’s poles are warming because that is natural variation and while the western Arctic may be getting somewhat warmer we also see that the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder

25) The IPCC claims climate driven “impacts on biodiversity are significant and of key relevance” but those claims are simply not supported by scientific research

26) The IPCC threat of climate change to the world’s species does not make sense as wild species are at least one million years old, which means they have all been through hundreds of climate cycles

27) Research goes strongly against claims that CO2-induced global warming would cause catastrophic disintegration of the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets.

28) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels are our best hope of raising crop yields to feed an ever-growing population

29) The biggest climate change ever experienced on earth took place around 700 million years ago

30) The slight increase in temperature which has been observed since 1900 is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term natural climate cycles

31) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels of some so-called “greenhouse gases” may be contributing to higher oxygen levels and global cooling, not warming

32) Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures

33) Today’s CO2 concentration of around 385 ppm is very low compared to most of the earth’s history – we actually live in a carbon-deficient atmosphere

34) It is a myth that CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas because greenhouse gases from about 3% of the atmosphere by volume, and CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere

35) It is a myth that computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming because computer models can be made to “verify” anything

36) There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes

37) One statement deleted from a UN report in 1996 stated that “none of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases”

38) The world “warmed” by 0.07 +/- 0.07 degrees C from 1999 to 2008, not the 0.20 degrees C expected by the IPCC

39) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says “it is likely that future tropical cyclones (typhoons and hurricanes) will become more intense” but there has been no increase in the intensity or frequency of tropical cyclones globally

40) Rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere can be shown not only to have a negligible effect on the Earth’s many ecosystems, but in some cases to be a positive help to many organisms

41) Researchers who compare and contrast climate change impact on civilizations found warm periods are beneficial to mankind and cold periods harmful

42) The Met Office asserts we are in the hottest decade since records began but this is precisely what the world should expect if the climate is cyclical

43) Rising CO2 levels increase plant growth and make plants more resistant to drought and pests

44) The historical increase in the air’s CO2 content has improved human nutrition by raising crop yields during the past 150 years

45) The increase of the air’s CO2 content has probably helped lengthen human life spans since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution

46) The IPCC alleges that “climate change currently contributes to the global burden of disease and premature deaths” but the evidence shows that higher temperatures and rising CO2 levels has helped global populations

47) In May of 2004, the Russian Academy of Sciences published a report concluding that the Kyoto Protocol has no scientific grounding at all.

48) The “Climate-gate” scandal pointed to a expensive public campaign of disinformation and the denigration of scientists who opposed the belief that CO2 emissions were causing climate change

49) The head of Britain’s climate change watchdog has predicted households will need to spend up to £15,000 on a full energy efficiency makeover if the Government is to meet its ambitious targets for cutting carbon emissions.

50) Wind power is unlikely to be the answer to our energy needs. The wind power industry argues that there are “no direct subsidies” but it involves a total subsidy of as much as £60 per MWh which falls directly on electricity consumers. This burden will grow in line with attempts to achieve Wind power targets, according to a recent OFGEM report.

51) Wind farms are not an efficient way to produce energy. The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) accepts a figure of 75 per cent back-up power is required.

52) Global temperatures are below the low end of IPCC predictions not at “at the top end of IPCC estimates”

53) Climate alarmists have raised the concern over acidification of the oceans but Tom Segalstad from Oslo University in Norway , and others, have noted that the composition of ocean water – including CO2, calcium, and water – can act as a buffering agent in the acidification of the oceans.

54) The UN’s IPCC computer models of human-caused global warming predict the emergence of a “hotspot” in the upper troposphere over the tropics. Former researcher in the Australian Department of Climate Change, David Evans, said there is no evidence of such a hotspot

55) The argument that climate change is a of result of global warming caused by human activity is the argument of flat Earthers.

56) The manner in which US President Barack Obama sidestepped Congress to order emission cuts shows how undemocratic and irrational the entire international decision-making process has become with regards to emission-target setting.

57) William Kininmonth, a former head of the National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World Meteorological Organization, wrote “the likely extent of global temperature rise from a doubling of CO2 is less than 1C. Such warming is well within the envelope of variation experienced during the past 10,000 years and insignificant in the context of glacial cycles during the past million years, when Earth has been predominantly very cold and covered by extensive ice sheets.”

58) Canada has shown the world targets derived from the existing Kyoto commitments were always unrealistic and did not work for the country.

59) In the lead up to the Copenhagen summit, David Davis MP said of previous climate summits, at Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and Kyoto in 1997 that many had promised greater cuts, but “neither happened”, but we are continuing along the same lines.

60) The UK ’s environmental policy has a long-term price tag of about £55 billion, before taking into account the impact on its economic growth.

61) The UN’s panel on climate change warned that Himalayan glaciers could melt to a fifth of current levels by 2035. J. Graham Cogley a professor at Ontario Trent University, claims this inaccurate stating the UN authors got the date from an earlier report wrong by more than 300 years.

62) Under existing Kyoto obligations the EU has attempted to claim success, while actually increasing emissions by 13 per cent, according to Lord Lawson. In addition the EU has pursued this scheme by purchasing “offsets” from countries such as China paying them billions of dollars to destroy atmospheric pollutants, such as CFC-23, which were manufactured purely in order to be destroyed.

63) It is claimed that the average global temperature was relatively unchanging in pre-industrial times but sky-rocketed since 1900, and will increase by several degrees more over the next 100 years according to Penn State University researcher Michael Mann. There is no convincing empirical evidence that past climate was unchanging, nor that 20th century changes in average global temperature were unusual or unnatural.

64) Michael Mann of Penn State University has actually shown that the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age did in fact exist, which contrasts with his earlier work which produced the “hockey stick graph” which showed a constant temperature over the past thousand years or so followed by a recent dramatic upturn.

65) The globe’s current approach to climate change in which major industrialized countries agree to nonsensical targets for their CO2 emissions by a given date, as it has been under the Kyoto system, is very expensive.

66) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had emailed one another about using a “trick” for the sake of concealing a “decline” in temperatures when looking at the history of the Earth’s temperature.

67) Global temperatures have not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years and have actually been falling for nine years. The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed a scientific team had expressed dismay at the fact global warming was contrary to their predictions and admitted their inability to explain it was “a travesty”.

68) The IPCC predicts that a warmer planet will lead to more extreme weather, including drought, flooding, storms, snow, and wildfires. But over the last century, during which the IPCC claims the world experienced more rapid warming than any time in the past two millennia, the world did not experience significantly greater trends in any of these extreme weather events.

69) In explaining the average temperature standstill we are currently experiencing, the Met Office Hadley Centre ran a series of computer climate predictions and found in many of the computer runs there were decade-long standstills but none for 15 years – so it expects global warming to resume swiftly.

70) Richard Lindzen, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote: “The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the Earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope. Such hysteria (over global warming) simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for truth.”

71) Despite the 1997 Kyoto Protocol’s status as the flagship of the fight against climate change it has been a failure.

72) The first phase of the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which ran from 2005 to 2007 was a failure. Huge over-allocation of permits to pollute led to a collapse in the price of carbon from €33 to just €0.20 per tonne meaning the system did not reduce emissions at all.

73) The EU trading scheme, to manage carbon emissions has completely failed and actually allows European businesses to duck out of making their emissions reductions at home by offsetting, which means paying for cuts to be made overseas instead.

74) To date “cap and trade” carbon markets have done almost nothing to reduce emissions.

75) In the United States , the cap-and-trade is an approach designed to control carbon emissions and will impose huge costs upon American citizens via a carbon tax on all goods and services produced in the United States. The average family of four can expect to pay an additional $1700, or £1,043, more each year. It is predicted that the United States will lose more than 2 million jobs as the result of cap-and-trade schemes.

76) Dr Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, has indicated that out of the 21 climate models tracked by the IPCC the differences in warming exhibited by those models is mostly the result of different strengths of positive cloud feedback – and that increasing CO2 is insufficient to explain global-average warming in the last 50 to 100 years.

77) Why should politicians devote our scarce resources in a globally competitive world to a false and ill-defined problem, while ignoring the real problems the entire planet faces, such as: poverty, hunger, disease or terrorism.

78) A proper analysis of ice core records from the past 650,000 years demonstrates that temperature increases have come before, and not resulted from, increases in CO2 by hundreds of years.

79) Since the cause of global warming is mostly natural, then there is in actual fact very little we can do about it. (We are still not able to control the sun).

80) A substantial number of the panel of 2,500 climate scientists on the United Nation’s International Panel on Climate Change, which created a statement on scientific unanimity on climate change and man-made global warming, were found to have serious concerns.

81) The UK’s Met Office has been forced this year to re-examine 160 years of temperature data after admitting that public confidence in the science on man-made global warming has been shattered by revelations about the data.

82) Politicians and activists push for renewable energy sources such as wind turbines under the rhetoric of climate change, but it is essentially about money – under the system of Renewable Obligations. Much of the money is paid for by consumers in electricity bills. It amounts to £1 billion a year.

83) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had tampered with their own data so as to conceal inconsistencies and errors.

84) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had campaigned for the removal of a learned journal’s editor, solely because he did not share their willingness to debase science for political purposes.

85) Ice-core data clearly show that temperatures change centuries before concentrations of atmospheric CO2 change. Thus, there appears to be little evidence for insisting that changes in concentrations of CO2 are the cause of past temperature and climate change.

86) There are no experimentally verified processes explaining how CO2 concentrations can fall in a few centuries without falling temperatures – in fact it is changing temperatures which cause changes in CO2 concentrations, which is consistent with experiments that show CO2 is the atmospheric gas most readily absorbed by water.

87) The Government’s Renewable Energy Strategy contains a massive increase in electricity generation by wind power costing around £4 billion a year over the next twenty years. The benefits will be only £4 to £5 billion overall (not per annum). So costs will outnumber benefits by a range of between eleven and seventeen times.

88) Whilst CO2 levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout history, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased since the beginning of the industrial revolution, and the growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years.

89) It is a myth that CO2 is a pollutant, because nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere and human beings could not live in 100% nitrogen either: CO2 is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is and CO2 is essential to life.

90) Politicians and climate activists make claims to rising sea levels but certain members in the IPCC chose an area to measure in Hong Kong that is subsiding. They used the record reading of 2.3 mm per year rise of sea level.

91) The accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998.

92) If one factors in non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, lower atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements show little, if any, global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 per cent).

93) US President Barack Obama pledged to cut emissions by 2050 to equal those of 1910 when there were 92 million Americans. In 2050, there will be 420 million Americans, so Obama’s promise means that emissions per head will be approximately what they were in 1875. It simply will not happen.

94) The European Union has already agreed to cut emissions by 20 percent to 2020, compared with 1990 levels, and is willing to increase the target to 30 percent. However, these are unachievable and the EU has already massively failed with its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), as EU emissions actually rose by 0.8 percent from 2005 to 2006 and are known to be well above the Kyoto goal.

95) Australia has stated it wants to slash greenhouse emissions by up to 25 percent below 2000 levels by 2020, but the pledges were so unpopular that the country’s Senate has voted against the carbon trading Bill, and the Opposition’s Party leader has now been ousted by a climate change skeptic.

96) Canada plans to reduce emissions by 20 percent compared with 2006 levels by 2020, representing approximately a 3 percent cut from 1990 levels but it simultaneously defends its Alberta tar sands emissions and its record as one of the world’s highest per-capita emissions setters.

97) India plans to reduce the ratio of emissions to production by 20-25 percent compared with 2005 levels by 2020, but all Government officials insist that since India has to grow for its development and poverty alleviation, it has to emit, because the economy is driven by carbon.

98) The Leipzig Declaration in 1996, was signed by 110 scientists who said: “We – along with many of our fellow citizens – are apprehensive about the climate treaty conference scheduled for Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997” and “based on all the evidence available to us, we cannot subscribe to the politically inspired world view that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty actions.”

99) A US Oregon Petition Project stated “We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind. There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of CO2, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”

100) A report by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change concluded “We find no support for the IPCC’s claim that climate observations during the twentieth century are either unprecedented or provide evidence of an anthropogenic effect on climate.”

But remember... The debate is over! ... and Al Gore invented the Internet!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

Arrogant assholes represent you!

So today... 12/15/2009... Obama has summoned the democrat Senators to the White House and is demanding that Healthcare Reform be passed by Christmas!

Interesting... a President with a 44% approval rating is instructing a representative government body with a 28% approval rating to pass a MAJOR legislative act that will fundamentally change AMERICA that has only a 34% approval rating.

Whatever happened to legislators representing their constituents? How can a President with less than half the population supporting him, demand a governing body with barely over 1 in 4 voters supporting them, pass a bill, (which will destroy the best, most advanced and innovative healthcare system in the world), that only 34% of American citizens want passed? What the hell is wrong with this picture?

Wake-up America! It's time for the 2nd American Revolution!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

Thomas Jefferson Quotes

How appropriate in today's society!

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who are not." .... Thomas Jefferson

Wake-Up American! It's time for the 2nd American Revolution.

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

I had a dream!

Obama strides up to the podium and starts his address:

My fellow Americans.

As we all know the America is experiencing an economic downturn. Although not as serious as the great depression (although it may get that bad if the dollar collapses) the failing economy has affected a significant portion of the American population. I am here tonight to announce a major change in my economic philosophy and policy.

As you know I have no experience in the private sector. I have never held a ‘real’ job! I have never produced anything or contributed to economic system! I have never run a business, made a payroll or employed anyone. I have always worked in the ‘public’ or ‘not for profit sector’, thus, I have very little understanding of capitalism or the free enterprise system. I have always surrounded myself with Leftists, Socialists, Marxists, Communists and generally Anti-Capitalists…. but… today, I have seen the failure of their ways and the fallacy of these economic philosophies. Today, I am announcing a series of new economic policies to re-energize our free enterprise economic system.

Starting immediately I am asking Congress to make the following changes to our Tax System:

Reduce the maximum personal rate tax rate to a maximum of 10%.

Freeze government spending and limit Federal spending to collected tax receipts. I have determined tax cuts stimulate economic growth faster and more efficiently than any Government program. In addition, tax cuts actually increase Government receipts as a direct result of an expanding economy as proven by the Reagan and Bush tax cuts of the 1980’s and 2000’s… Tax rates were cut, thus, providing more capital for business investments and expansion and resulting increased tax receipts collected by the IRS and increase employment. The days of old, out of date Keynesian economic theory is over.

Freeze the $787 billion Stimulus Bill of 2009. It has failed to stimulate the economy. Government spending cannot stimulate the economy. You cannot spend your way out of a recession. In addition, the majority of the money appropriated doesn’t get spent until mid to late 2010 or just in time for the next congressional election and will have no positive effect on today’s economy.

I am announcing an immediate suspension of all payroll taxes and employer matching funds. Let the American people keep what they earn to feed and house their families, educate their children and invest their hard earned money in what they determine is right for them… not what the Government determines is best for its citizens.

An economic recovery cannot be sustained without job creation. Businesses today have cut employment down to muscle and bone. They have eliminated all the fat in their firms and operations. Frankly, many businesses have learned they can make money or at least survive during this downturn at significantly reduced employment levels. Expanding our economic system will create jobs and sustain an economic recovery. We must adopt incentives for small business since small business employs 80% of Americans and is the backbone of our economic system. We must in the future reduce the tax and regulation burden on small business to sustain any economic recovery.

My administration has created a $1.4 trillion dollar deficit this year alone. This sum is more than all the deficits accumulated from all Presidents and Administrations since the inception of our Country… all in just 10 months! This is unsustainable and basically immoral. It will rob our children of a sound economic future since our children will have to pay for our outrageous spending with exorbitant tax rates in the future.

This is just the first of many new policies my administration will adopt over the next few months in an all out effort to get our economy moving again, to get American’s back to work and help build a stronger American. A strong America contributes to a more stable world.

Over the next few weeks you can expect my administration to announce more new policies designed to stimulate our economy and help you create a better future for you and your family.

Thank you, good night and God bless America. BUZZ...BUZZ...BUZZ... the alarm is going off... it's time to wake-up. I roll over look at my lovely wife and say... "Boy... you won't believe the dream I just had!"

Wake-up American! It's time for the 2nd AMERICAN Revolution!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

Whoopi Goldberg is an Idiot!

The above pictured individual is an idiot!

BACKGROUND: Roman Polanski faced charges of rape and sodomy of a 13 years girl in 1978. He pled guilty to sexual intercourse with a minor and spent 42 days in jail during a psychological evaluation. Upon release from the evaluation period and pending sentencing for the admitted crime, he fled the USA. His comment was “You know what, this guy’s going to give me 100 years in jail. I’m not staying” and he ran. His 13 year old victim told a grand jury the director plied her with champagne and drugs and took nude pictures of her in a hot tub. Then Polanski had oral, anal and sexual intercourse with the 13 year old despite her resistance and requests to be taken home.

So here we are 30 years later. Roman Polanski travels to Zurich, Switzerland and U.S. authorities arrest him and he faces extradition back to the U.S. for sentencing of the admitted crime.

Now comes one of the most ignorant statements you’ll ever hear! Whoopi Goldberg’s comment was... "I know it wasn't rape-rape. I think it was something else, but I don't believe it was rape-rape.

Just so I understand Whoopi... you don’t consider using liquor and drugs on a 13 year old girl and forcing her to have sex despite her resistance... as rape? “It’s something else”... but it’s not rape according to Whoopi!

Whoopi... so is “rape-rape” different than “rape”? Whoopi... please define “rape-rape” and how it differs from just plain “rape”?

Whoopi...you are an idiot! No.. you are an... Idiot-Idiot!!!

Sincerely,
The Flyover Conservative

2nd American Revolution!

What do I mean by the ‘2nd American Revolution’.

I close most of my politically oriented blogs with the same statement: “Wake-Up America… It’s time for the 2nd American Revolution”. Someone ask me… exactly what do I mean by that statement? Do you mean a full civil uprising? A violent takeover of Congress?… maybe the White House? … and then there’s the Judicial Branch? A Coup de Grace of sorts? An unprecedented use of the Military? Citizens marching into the Capitol and offering the lying, self serving scoundrels a simple choice: 1) leave now… never to return inside the beltway… or 2) be machine gunned in your seat?

What exactly do I mean when I say… “It’s time for the 2nd American Revolution! It’s pretty simple… any or all of the above! I really don’t care how it’s done but we need a dramatic change in Washington D.C. We need to return to the ideals established by the founding fathers and the principles of the U.S. Constitution. Our nation’s Capitol is full of corrupt politicians, lobbyists, liars, tax cheats, modern day money changers, criminals in white collars…basically… almost all of our representatives are scum bags and need to be removed from inside the beltway.

Here’s a few suggestions:
1) We need ‘Term Limits’. 2 terms in the House and one term in the Senate. If you’re in now… you’re out at the next election and you must stay out for at least 2 terms before you can return. No longer can being a politician be a ‘full time’ job. It's a privledge and honor to serve your constituents… not a career! In addition, ALL elections will be publicly funded. Evenly funded with no outside organization trying to buy politicians!
2) Nullify ALL CFR’s (Codes of Federal Regulations) and return to State Law for your legal system. Yes there will be some confusion but the States will work out the details.
3) Outlaw lobbyists. Anyone attempting to influence a politician with any type of financial gain will face a minimum of 30 years, hard time, with no chance for parole on the first offense… the death sentence on the second offense!
4) Congress will only be in session a maximum of 3 month per year. If they are not ‘in session’… they can’t spend billions we don’t have!
5) Eliminate deficit spending unless in the case of a national security approved and confirmed by a majority of State Legislatures.
6) The Executive Branch of the Federal Government should only be involved in a very limited number of matters.
a) the use of active duty military on foreign soil and Veteran affairs (DOD)
b) foreign relations (State Dept)…
c) the safety and efficacy of pharmaceuticals and medical devices (FDA)
d) International Intelligence (CIA)…
e) Domestic Security (Homeland Security and National Intelligence)
f) Monetary policy (printing money, Treasury)

Eliminate the majority of Federal agencies: Send these Federal employees home!
Dept of Energy:Failed to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
Dept of Education: Education is a local and State issue… not a centralized government issue.
Dept of Agriculture: Let the free market determine farm markets. Free markets work!
Dept of Labor: Labor is a local issue.
Dept of Transportation: The FAA can handle aircraft issues. NTSB the rest.
Dept of Interior: Each State can handle its own affairs.
Dept of Commerce: Free markets work… government planning does not!
Dept of HHS: now a State issue.
Dept of Justice: now a State issue.

Any proposed new law must be published for public review for at least 30 days prior to any vote.

Congressional Representatives are subject to the same laws and programs as U.S. Citizens. No special retirement or healthcare programs specifically for Congressional Representatives.
Federal Taxes can never be more than 5% of individual or Corporate net income unless approved by a 2/3 majority of State Legislatures. No citizen should have to work more than ½ day for the Federal Government. (each State will develop its own tax policy)

I’ve made some suggestions that will reduce the size of the Federal Government and reverse the massive power grab we’ve experienced over the last 70 years. I’d like to hear your suggestions!

Sincerely,
The Flyover Conservative

WOW… so V.P. Biden says the Republican Congressman’s shout out to Obama... “You Lie”… was ‘demeaning to the institution’. Did I hear him right… ‘Demeaning to Congress’… I don’t think the institution known as the U.S. Congress could be ‘demeaned’ any more than it already is. Congress has the lowest rating in history! In fact, I kind of like it when the opposition party members verbally points out a blatant lie… especially during prime time coverage. Watch the British Parliament for real verbal abuse!

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called President Bush a loser and a liar. During a Tim Russert interview on December 5, 2004, Reid called President Bush a Liar and on May 6, 2005, Reid called President Bush a Loser in front of school children when the President was out of the Country on a foreign visit to Latvia. Of course Reid didn’t call Bush a liar and a loser to his face… no… he did it during an interview and a public event in front of children. Remember the Feb 2, 2004, State of the Union address, Democrats openly booed President Bush when he noted that Social Security would be bankrupt by 2042 (gee… a recent Congressional Budget Office estimates indicate Social Security could be bankrupt as soon as 2017). So were the Dems booing Bush because his date was wrong or because the system is going bankrupt and the Dems didn’t want that pointed out to the American public during the State of the Union.

What’s wrong with pointing out a blatant lie… even if it is during a prime time speech by the President! A lie to the American people is worst type of lie. The President is a known liar… need I point out the dozens of lies he has made to the public during his campaign and the 8 months of his administration? Just read some of my previous blogs… I’ve pointed out lie after lie after lie!

But let’s get to why a congressman called out… “You Lie” to the President. The President just made a statement that illegal’s would not be covered under his plan! (Hey… where is the President’s plan anyway? … Nobody has seen it… I know he referenced “His Plan” multiple times during that speech but nobody has seen it… So is that another lie… Anyway… for Obama to make the statement that illegal’s would not be covered... is a blatant lie to the American people. So what’s wrong with calling him on that lie? The Congressman didn’t call Obama a liar... (Although he is a liar)… he just said… “You Lie”… and the President WAS lying!!! So what's the problem?

The truth hurts! Boy... these Progressives get just a little sensitive when you point a problem with their leader's credibility!

Sincerely,
The Flyover Conservative

This is great!

Listen and laugh... (or cry)... because there are millions of people out there that believe the government can provide you with everything!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAmVYf23J-k

Wake-up America! It's time for the 2nd American Revolution!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

Try this!

Here's an idea!

You're hearing a lot of numbers concerning how citizens people are actually without health insurance in the U.S. Obama and his band of idiots first said it was 46 million but that included 20 million illegals. You'll also hear 10 million, 20 million 25 million etc... let's not forget... anyone can walk into (or be delivered to) an Emergency Room and by law the hospital MUST treat them! So basically NO ONE is denied healthcare in America.... even non-citizens... but back to my original thought.

Let's use a figure of 20 million citizens un-insured in America.... and let's use a figure of $650 per month per person for coverage... so that's like $13 Billion per month or $156 Billion per year. I know that sounds like a lot of money... but... $156 billion a year is chump change! Our government is running $1.8 trillion deficiet this year (spending $1.8 Trillion.. more than it will take in this year) ... so $156 billion is not a lot in the big picture.

How about we try this... set aside $156 billion (of course bureaucrats will need to reduce existing programs by $156 billion to come up with that sum... I don't want ANY new tax money supporting this experiment... ya.. like that's going to happen! ... name just one government program that has been reduced in size over the years) and make this available to health insurance companies and providers to cover those 20 million citizens. We'll also limit malpractice liability if you're one of the 20 million to enter the program. (Hey... you're getting something for free so... no potential outrageous multi-million dollar awards if someone puts a band-aid on wrong!)

The free market will produce a more efficient and competitive healthcare delivery system to get a piece of that $156 billion, thus, reducing costs? The BIGGER benefit of this experiment is that the more efficient policies, procedures, and pricing structure will eventually migrate to the 'for profit/non-government' side of the healthcare system. We don't need to overhaul the entire system to provide healthcare to a small percentage of the population.

I don't care if you use this type of system or some other similar concept because what you really need to understand is that government controlled healthcare is NOT about healthcare... it's about government asserting authority over the most important part of your life. Once you lose control over your healthcare you have lost your independence and given up control over your life... and that's what the Progressives want... more control over your life. Control over every aspect of your life! Once the Progressives have control of your healthcare they can tell you what to eat, what you must weigh, what you can drive, what you can drink, they can tax "unhealthy foods", they can tax where you live... and don't even think about that fine Cuban cigar... and on and on and on... more control over your life.

What you need is LESS government control over your life... not more! Don't give government more control over anything... especially your healthcare!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

Remember Mary Jo Kopechne!

Remember Mary Jo Kopechne! That was going to be my bumper sticker if Teddy Kennedy ever became a serious candidate for President.

Teddy Kennedy broke the cardinal rule of politics... never get caught with a live boy or a dead girl! Well... Teddy didn't exactly get caught with a dead girl... she was found dead in his car... under water... after he waited 11 hours (probably to sober up) before reporting his July 1969 vehicular homicide of Mary Jo Kopechne... a young Robert Kennedy Campaign (the Boiler Room Girls) worker that drown in Teddy's car when Teddy drove off Chappaquiddick bridge!

Teddy's advisors certainly were lucky we had just landed on the moon and the public's attention was centered on the accomplishment of his brother's challenge, rather than the indictable conduct of his younger brother... Teddy... and I don't mean getting kicked out of Harvard for paying a fellow student to take a test for him or being denied a commision in the US Army because, again, he was caught cheating on tests.

Now... I could go on and on disparaging the bloated, alcoholic, egotistical, murderer known as the younger brother of John and Bobby... he's hardly worth it... and my mother taught me not to speak badly about the dead. Just think.... if Evan Bayh's dad hadn't pulled Teddy out of that plane I wouldn't be writing this... thanks Birch... I think!

I only have one question about the younger Kennedy brother? We all know John was married to Jackie but recently we learned Bobby was doing Jackie after John's death... (I guess Jackie had a thing for power and money... especially if the money was made from prostitution and bootlegging... or shipping... what did Ethel say about all this? ... oh my God, this could be an adult viewing hour soap opera... or maybe an HBO series... let's call it... Cum-a-lot!

So here's the question... was Teddy also doing Jackie? Oh... I hear groans and whisper coming from the audience... they're saying ... "What a vicious attack!" ... my response... Not as vicious as Teddy's attack on Bork or Justice Thomas!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

I can hardly wait for Government Healthcare!

Let’s review some Government run programs!

U.S. Postal System: Government run. After 235 years it's broken and losing billions. According to President Obama the privately run delivery systems like UPS and FedEx are doing just fine!

Social Security: Broken and will be bankrupt in 2017 or sooner.

Fannie Mae: Broken. Full of toxic assets. Required bailout using your tax dollars.

War on Poverty: The longest war in American history. Recap: Spent trillions of tax dollars with no measurable result.

Medicare: Bankrupt and actual costs are 9 times what Government projected.

Medicaid: Bankrupt. State matching funds requirements bankrupting many State budgets. As much as 35% waste, fraud and abuse.

Freddie Mac: Broken and full of toxic assets. Bailout required using taxpayer dollars.

Viet Nam War: U.S. Military was run out of the Country because the war was prosecuted by politicians not Generals.

AMTRAK: Has never made a profit and costs taxpayers billions to continue operation.

VA Medical System: Presently rationing care and basically run with the same mentality as Postal System. Excellent example of a Government run healthcare program!

U.S. Energy Dept: Established in 1970 with directive to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil. Result: Total failure. The U.S. now imports a higher percentage of its oil requirements from foreign sources.

U.S. Dept of Agriculture: Now employs more government bureaucrats than the number of family farms in America.

War or Drugs: Total Failure. Narco terrorists entering our Southern Border and controlling significant territory in South America. Drug use at all time high in America.

Cash for Clunkers: Bankrupt within weeks. Government failing to reimburse U.S. Auto Dealers on timely basis. $3 billion program administered by clowns and we’ll soon have cash for refrigerators!

U.S. Congress: Out of control spending resulting in a 1.6 Trillion dollar deficit in 2009. Members of Congress now answer to special interests rather than serving their constituents.

Stimulus Package of 2009: 787 Billion of your tax dollars to stimulate economic growth. Result- Record high unemployment. Record high foreclosure rate. Record high bankruptcy filings. Hey... How's that Hope and Change working out for you?

The only government programs, I can remember, that have been successful over the past 70 years have been the prosecution of the 2nd World War… because Generals were in charge of winning… and the JFK challenge of putting a man on the moon within 10 years… again… because it was a collaboration between private industry and the scientific community. NOT Government bureaucrats!

Government is not the answer! Government is the problem! Government is the opposite of efficiency. Government breeds meritocracy. Government produces waste, fraud and abuse! Private industry will produce the most efficient program because of competition. The free market creates efficiency!

Government run Healthcare is NOT about Healthcare... it's about CONTROL over your life by pseudo elitists that think you are too stupid to know what's best for you. They think they know what's best and want to force their thinking on you and your family!

Wake up America! Government run Healthcare… the public option, single payer or whatever the progressives are calling it this week… will be a disaster just like the all the programs listed above!

It’s time for the 2nd American Revolution!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

Pay Up!

Here are 2 very interesting web sites that clearly detail the out of control spending and massive public debt our Federal Government has accumulated.

http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Now this site, at the time of posting, indicates your individual portion of the US National Debt is about $38,000! And that the Federal government has spent this year to date about $8,400 per citizen, and it's only the end of August. Moving down the page you'll see your government has spent over $11 trillion of your tax dollars on government bailouts... that's trillion with a "T" and remember it's your money because the government doesn't have any money except what it gets from you and me... the individual taxpayer!

Moving down the page you can review Financial Meltdown info, Private Debt, Credit Card Debt and Medical Debt, Unemployment Numbers, Bankruptcies and Foreclosures, etc,... all very interesting and mind boggling! Then as you move down the page you can view present Trade Numbers and Oil Imports which is pretty scary in itself!

The MOST interesting numbers are at the bottom of the page... it indicates U.S. UNFUNDED LIABILITIES... which at the time of this posting is approaching $59 trillion dollars... yes... that's trillion with a "T". Now what is an 'UNFUNDED LIABILITY'? You'll notice it's broken into 3 parts 1) Medicare/Medicaid, 2) Social Security and 3) Prescription Drugs. UNFUNDED means these are government obligations it has made to its citizens (entitloements) for which there is no money... no funding (thus the term UN-funded)... a promise to pay with no means of paying... think about that.... cannot pay and has no means of paying these entitlements!

Think about that last set of numbers... $59 Trillion... with no means of paying for those obligations! And just think your individual portion of that unfunded liability, each of children's individual portion of that unfunded liability and each or your grand children's individual portions of that unfunded liability is $192,000... each! Look around you... everyone you see, every person in the USA owes $192,000 as their portion of those unfunded liabilities!

The second web site... http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np is a government (U.S. Treasury) web site that not only confirms the above information (give or take a few Billion) but will give you even more detail of this pending financial disaster!

Wake up American... it's time for the 2nd American Revolution! Go to 'Town Hall Meeting', take a video camera, and ask your Senator or Representative the hard questions! Remind them they work and answer to us!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

The Seante took the "Death Panels" out even though the Obama Administration said they were never in!

Now the Obama Administration has always claimed there were no "Death Panels" in the Healthcare Reform Bill! Ya... right... Oh I forgot... nobody read it! (Well... see page 430 of the House Bill)

Then last Friday the U.S. Senate (sensing the natives are getting restless) announced those "Death Panels", the Obama Administration said were never in the Bill.... had been removed from the Senate version of the Bill.

OK now let me see... Obama Administration says the "Death Panels" were never in the Bill... then the Senate said the "Death Panels" were removed from the Bill. So how do you remove something that wasn't there?

Hummm... can you say "LIARS" or is it just that nobody in the Obama Administration has their sh*t together!

Wake up America... it's time for the second American Revolution! Keep up the good work and express yourself at a Town Hall meeting with your Congressional Representatives... and remember to take a video camera!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

4 months?

I am now totally convinced any money the USA puts into the United Nations is flushing your hard earned tax dollars down the toilet. I once thought the U.N. did a reasonable job of providing meals to refugees... but after this... I think even that task might be too much responsibility!

This statement is taken directly from a speech by the Secretary General of the United Nations, Ban Ki-moon, given to the Global Environmental Forum. You remember good old Ban, Ki-moon! Hell of a guy!

And I quote: "We have just four months. Four months to secure the future of our planet. Any agreement must be fair, effective, equitable and comprehensive, and based on science. And it must help vulnerable nations adapt to climate change."

Oh My God... "just 4 months to save the planet"! Ban Ki-moon says we have just 4 months! Run... run... the sky is falling... no... no... the moon is falling!

Let's see now... so by mid-December if no major climate legislation is passed and the world doesn't reduce CO2 output we can all kiss it goodbye? Starvation, war, pestilence, plague, mass extension... all the worst cases in the Bible! Hey... bring on the Dom, Cubans (cigars) and pole dancers... It will be one hell of a New Years party!

My question... How could any reasonably intelligent human make such a statement and not expect to be laughed at? That's just it... they couldn't! What scientific FACT is this clown basing his conclusion? This guy is Secretary General of the United Nations for God's sake... and he's just made a statement to the WORLD that we have only 4 month to secure the future of our planet! What a joke! And how many 'BILLIONS" do we taxpayers put into the U.N. every year?

Again... ANY money the USA puts into the United Nations is a total waste!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

We are in a fight for the heart and soul of America!

Let there be NO mistake... we are engaged in a battle for the heart and soul of America, the free enterprise system, individualism, democracy... the Republic... as we know it! The battlefield against the Progressives movement is HEALTHCARE! (By the way the Obama Administration is now calling it... Healthcare Insurance Reform) A single party payer program run by bureaucrats in DC will lead to the end of the American experiment as we know it.

What you will hear over the next few weeks coming from the Obama Administration will be a lie concerning the extent the proposed healthcare overhaul will have on your life. They will say... you will be able to keep your doctor, your private insurance coverage, your treatment options... basically your individual choice to make an informed decision concerning your healthcare... without government interference. If you believe any of the crap that comes from the Obama Administration or the progressive movement that supports the plan over the next few weeks... then you are in serious need of mental help.

If there is any question that Obama and the progressive movement wants to take the American healthcare system to a single party payer (socialised medicine) just review the following:

Rep Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dT4mV3R7vu4&feature=player_embedded

Rep. Barney Frank: (D-MA) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3BS4C9el98&feature=player_embedded

Obama: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpAyan1fXCE.

The American Healthcare System accounts for almost 20% of the American economy. The proposed overhaul of the systems is nothing more than a massive expansion of power and control by the Federal Government. A power grab by people that feel you are too stupid to make informed decisions about you own life. Elitists that think they know what's best for you.. although they will not have to participate in the healthcare program they are proposing for you! They will be enrolled in a system for legislators and government employees that offer true choice, multiple options of hospitals, doctors, treatment... the very best healthcare that can be attained... not the program you will be in! Not to mention... they haven't even read the Bill!

Wake Up American! Get off your couch and get involved. It's time for the 2nd American Revolution! Contact your elected officials... your Representative... your Senators... and tell them to say NO to a single party payer healthcare program.

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

Clunkers for Healthcare!

Let's see... when Obama first announced his plan to overhaul the healthcare system in American it was to cover the 46 million uninsured... but you take away 20 million illegals (Americans are tired of paying billions of dollars for the healthcare of non-Americans), then 9 million more that are eligible for Medicaid but refuse to use the program, and about 10 million more that are either long term or short term uninsured due to unemployment and your left with about 9 million that are chronic uninsured. Hummm... 9 million people (less than 3% of the population) and he wants to overhaul the best healthcare system in the world! It would seem to me a stop gap program to cover the long and short uninsured might be a more cost effective solution... but NO... Obama wants to overhaul the entire frickin' healthcare system!

So when those numbers came out... he and his band of idiots changed their story to 'cost savings'. Moving to a one payer system would save money... but they shot themselves in the foot (like I said... 'a band of idiots') when they had already reported the house version would cost an additional $1 trillion dollars (that's an additional trillion dollars... with a "T" ... not a lot of cost saving there)... so that didn't work... and made them look like they acted 'stupidly'.. just to borrow a phrase from PresBO... (President Barack Obama... it's PresBO... cuz we tite)!

So the band of idiots have again changed their story and now it's the insurance companies that are the devil! The merry band of idiots will be preaching... it's the evil insurance companies that's the problem! Those greedy insurance companies... they're making a profit!

SIDE NOTE: I don't see a lot of Americans running to Canada or England to receive healthcare... although I do see a lot of foreigners coming to America to receive healthcare... like the PM of Italy (Berlusconi) came here a few months ago for heart surgery. Do you think Obama would run to Italy for heart surgery? ... not so much!

Let's cut the bullsh*t! Obama is a Marxist! In his community organizer world "profit" is a bad thing... but if you make a profit... it needs to be spread around! Central planning and government control is best! Big government is the answer!

Big government can't even run a "cash for clunkers" program... but they want to run your healthcare! Big government has bankrupt Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and the VA Medical System and Obama wants a 'single payer' ('single payer'... is just another word for socialized medicine) healthcare system in America. So when Obama says he's NOT trying destroy private insurance, and his plan will include private insurance... just watch this video: http://www.breitbart.tv/uncovered-video-obama-explains-how-his-health-care-plan-will-eliminate-private-insurance/

Obama's healthcare plan is just another massive grab for power and expansion of central authority.

Elections have consequences! Wake-up America. It's time for the 2nd American Revolution!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

Gotta love this!

This is sooo good I had to add it to my blog. My thanks to John Martin.

Jesse Jackson has added former Chicago Congressman (and convicted felon) Mel Reynolds to Rainbow/PUSH Coalition's payroll. Reynolds was among the 176 criminals excused in President Clinton's last-minute forgiveness spree. Reynolds received a commutation of his six-and-a-half-year federal sentence for 15 convictions of wire fraud, bank fraud, and lies to the Federal Election Commission. He is more notorious, however, for concurrently serving five years for sleeping with an underage campaign volunteer.

This is a first in American politics: An ex-congressman who had sex with an underage subordinate...won clemency from a president who had sex with a subordinate....then was hired by a clergyman who had sex with a subordinate!

Mr. Reynolds new job... ready for this... YOUTH COUNSELOR !!

IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY OR WHAT?

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

God help us!

This is a classic example of the logic we are dealing with in the inexperienced and totally inept Obama Administration!

VP Joe Biden, one heart beat away from the Presidency, told a AARP town hall meeting.... ‘We Have to Go Spend Money to Keep From Going Bankrupt’...

That's all that needs to be said in this blog post! The VP of the United States just said... ‘We Have to Go Spend Money to Keep From Going Bankrupt’...

I rest my case when it come to my rather dim view of Obama and his band of idiots in his administration!

God help us!

Wake up America! It's time for the 2nd American Revolution!

Sincerely,
The Flyover Conservative

CZAR's... not so good!

The term 'CZAR', used extensively by the Obama Administration is a curious word in the AMERICAN lexicon. Most of us think of the Romanoff family (Czar of Russia) at the time of the Russian Revolution in 1917... by the way... if you are a product of public school outcome based education.... it didn't turn out so well for the CZAR and his family. They were marched into a woods by Lenin's henchmen, slaughtered and their bodies burned... umm.... not so good for the CZAR!

Anyway... the word 'CZAR' comes from the word 'Caesar' and is defined as "one having great power". Between you and me... the term 'CZAR' has never really been associated with a positive image here in the United States of America. It sounds funny, foreign, almost outdated and autocratic. So why does Obama use the term 'CZAR'.... BECAUSE 'DICTATOR' IS EVEN LESS ACCEPTABLE!!!

The following is a list of already appointed and yet to be appointed CZAR's proposed by the Obama Administration.

1. Technology Czar: Aneesh Chopra.

2. Drug Czar: Gil Kerlikowske

3. Copyright Czar: Not appointed yet.

4. Energy Czar: Carol M. Browner

5. Car Czar: Ed Montgomery.

6. Terrorism/WMD Czar: Gary Samore.

7. Health Care Czar: Nancy-Ann DeParle.

8. Education Czar: Not appointed yet.

9. Economic Czar: Paul Volcker.

10. Mortgage Czar: Not appointed yet.

11. Urban Affairs/Housing Czar: Adolfo Carrion.

12. Guantanomo closure Czar: Danny Fried.

13. Great lakes Czar: Cameron Davis.

14. Stimulus accountability Czar: Earl Devaney.

15. Cyberspace Czar: Not appointed yet.

16. Border Czar: Alan Bersin (Former US attorney).

17. Intelligence Czar: Admiral Dennis Blair.

18. Regulatory Czar: Cass Sunstein.

19. Pay Czar: Kenneth Feinberg

20. Iran Czar: Not appointed yet.

21. Tarp Czar: Herb Allison.

22. Middle-East peace Czar: George Mitchell.

23. Science Czar: John Holdren.

24. Green jobs Czar: Van Jones.

25. Afghanistan Czar: Richard Holbrooke.

26. Sudan Czar: J. Scott Gration.

27. Mideast policy Czar: Dennis Ross.

28. Information Czar: Vivek Kundra.

29. AIDS Czar: Jeffrey Crowley.

30. Faith-based Czar: Joshua Dubois.

31. Climate Czar: Todd Stern.

So you're saying to yourself...

'I didn't know all these 'CZARS' were appointed.'

'Who the hell are these people?'

'What is this costing us?'

'What do these people make?'

'What authority do they have?'

'Don't we already have a Secretary of State?... a Department of Energy... a FDA Chief... Health and Human Services... Treasury... Interior... Environment... and heads of all the other Federal Departments... so what the hell are those guys doing if there's a CZAR for the same function?

Interestingly enough... the CZAR's salaries are not reported! They have no job descriptions! We don't know anything about their staff or their responsibilities... and all this from the Obama Administration... which claims to be the most transparent and open administration ever! Bullsh*t! Ask yourself this question... What is the Constitutional authority for these CZARs? ANSWER: There is NONE!

Wake up America! It's time for the 2nd American Revolution!

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

The Government Plantation

I can't remember slavery and nor can anyone else because anyone who lived in that time is now DEAD! Obviously slavery in America is a black mark on American history and should never be forgotten.... but here's the thought of the day: Isn't the massive expansion of Government we've experienced since Jan 2009, the growing dependency on the Nanny State and the significant intrusion by Government into every one's lives, just like the 'Plantation System' during slavery.

As a slave you we totally dependent upon the Plantation for virtually everything. The Plantation was the center of your life. You were forced to work for the Plantation. You received your food from the Plantation. Your housing was controlled and provided by the Plantation. Clothing... provided by the Plantation and the Master. Healthcare, although limited, was provided at the mercy of the Plantation and the Master. Your spouse may have been determined by the Plantation and your children were absorbed into the Plantation system. You and your fellow slaves were totally dependent upon the Plantation system for everything.

Today more and more citizens (and non-citizens) are becoming dependent the Government Plantation. We are experiencing a massive expansion of the government control over our lives just like slaves. And just like a slave you are having to comply with what the Master wants you to eat, drink, live and sleep in, how to educate of your children and soon the doctor you'll be allowed to see. (Side note: I found Obama's comment insulting that "under his healthcare reform act, you'll be allowed to keep your own Doctor"... be allowed... be allowed... who the hell is Obama to tell me I'll "be allowed" to keep my Doctor)

Eventually slaves rebelled against the Master and the Plantation System. They practiced what made the Country great.... 'Individualism'. The slave as an individual (group) rose up against the System in hopes of bettering himself and defeating the oppressive Plantation System which was immoral and degrading. A revolt to defeat the Plantation System which stripped the slave of his individualism, his dignity, his drive to be self sufficient, to better his family's plight and not have to rely on the Master and Plantation.

Individualism made America great. Individualism will return America to it's greatness of her past.... now we just need the revolt. Are you becoming a slave?

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative

NBC is now the 'State Run Media'!

As an independent observer of inter-action between humans I got a big kick out of this.

At this point everyone knows NBC and MSNBC have lost ALL objectivity and credibility as legitimate news media... and have basically become the 'State Run Media" for the Obama Administration. If you don't agree... get your head out of ass and watch this!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLYtHHxTTmc Now ask yourself why NBC's Brian Williams would bow to the Messiah?

Gee... let's see... NBC/MSNBC is owned by GE... Jeff Immelt is CEO of GE... Immelt is in Obama's pocket... so I guess I understand why Williams would bow to the KING!

Sincerely,
The Flyover Conservative

Sotomayor is a RACIST!

WOW... now here is a racist statement if I have ever heard one!

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion [as a judge] than a white male who hasn’t lived that life." ... in her own words... Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.

So as a racist she can reach a better conclusion than a white male.... Gee I thought justice was suppose to be blind. I though a judge was to interrupt the law as an impartial party and NOT let your personal feeling or experiences interfere or affect your judgement!

So according to this racist... a Latina woman can reach a 'better conclusion" than a black male... what about a black female? If I was black, I'd be pissed! So she can reach a 'better conclusion' than Justice Thomas because he's black and she's Latina? That's what she's saying! If I'm of Asian heritage, male or female, I'd be insulted? If I was a white female, I'd be questioning the objectivity of this person? So she can reach a better conclusion that a latino Male? That's what she is saying!

What the hell difference does your heritage or color make when interpreting the law as it relates to the U.S. Constitution? It matters when you are an obvious racist and you will interpret law NOT based upon the U.S. Constitution... but on your personal empathy and ethnicity.

Interesting... we have now descended to a point where judicial objectivity is no longer a requirement for the U.S. Supreme Court... the requirement now is bias based upon ethnicity!

Thanks Barry... we'll probably be living with your racist nominee setting on the highest court in the land for the next 25 years! Obviously her racist attitude will influence her decisions and promote racism for years to come.

Sincerely,

The Flyover Conservative